<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>COMMENTARIES ON LIVING SERIES II CHAPTER 2 'CONDITIONING'</TITLE>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="k.css"></HEAD><BODY>
<TABLE align=center border=0 width=450><TR><TD align=center height=80><br>
<FONT size=5 color=black><B>COMMENTARIES ON LIVING SERIES II CHAPTER 2 'CONDITIONING'</B></FONT><br><br><br><DIV class='PP2'>HE WAS VERY concerned with helping humanity, with doing good works, and was active in various social-welfare organizations.  He said he had literally never taken a long holiday, and that since his graduation from college he had worked constantly for the betterment of man.  Of course he wasn't taking any money for the work he was doing.  His work had always been very important to him, and he was greatly attached to what he did.  He had become a first-class social worker, and he loved it.  But he had heard something in one of the talks about the various kinds of escape which condition the mind, and he wanted to talk things over.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
"Do you think being a social worker is conditioning?  Does it only bring about further conflict?"
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Let us find out what we mean by conditioning.  When are we aware that we are conditioned?  Are we ever aware of it?  Are you aware that you are conditioned, or are you only aware of conflict, of struggle at various levels of your being?  Surely, we are aware, not of our conditioning, but only of conflict, of pain and pleasure.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
"What do you mean by conflict?"
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Every kind of conflict: the conflict between nations, between various social groups, between individuals, and the conflict within oneself.  Is not conflict inevitable as long as there is no integration between the actor and his action, between challenge and response?  Conflict is our problem, is it not?  Not any one particular conflict, but all conflict: the struggle between ideas, beliefs, ideologies, between the opposites.  If there were no conflict there would be no problems.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
"Are you suggesting that we should all seek a life of isolation, of contemplation?"
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Contemplation is arduous, it is one of the most difficult things to understand.  Isolation, though each one is consciously or unconsciously seeking it in his own way, does not solve our problems; on the contrary, it increases them.  We are trying to understand what are the factors of conditioning which bring further conflict.  We are only aware of conflict, of pain and pleasure, and we are not aware of our conditioning.  What makes for conditioning?
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
"Social or environmental influences: the society in which we were born, the culture in which we have been raised, economic and political pressures, and so on."
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
That is so; but is that all?  These influences are our own product, are they not?  Society is the outcome of man's relationship with man, which is fairly obvious.  This relationship is one of use, of need, of comfort, of gratification, and it creates influences, values that bind us.  The binding is our conditioning.  By our own thoughts and actions we are bound; but we are not aware that we are bound, we are only aware of the conflict of pleasure and pain.  We never seem to go beyond this; and if we do, it is only into further conflict.  We are not aware of our conditioning, and until we are, we can only produce further conflict and confusion.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
"How is one to be aware of one's conditioning?"
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
It is possible only by understanding another process, the process of attachment.  If we can understand why we are attached, then perhaps we can be aware of our conditioning.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
"Isn't that rather a long way round to come to a direct question?"
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Is it?  just try to be aware of your conditioning.  You can only know it indirectly, in relation to something else.  You cannot be aware of your conditioning as an abstraction, for then it is merely verbal, without much significance.  We are only aware of conflict. Conflict exists when there is no integration between challenge and response.  This conflict is the result of our conditioning. Conditioning is attachment: attachment to work, to tradition, to property, to people, to ideas, and so on.  If there were no attachment, would there be conditioning?  Of course not.  So why are we attached?  I am attached to my country because through identification with it I become somebody.  I identify myself with my work, and the work becomes important.  I am my family, my property; I am attached to them.  The object of attachment offers me the means of escape from my own emptiness.  Attachment is escape, and it is escape that strengthens conditioning.  If I am attached to you, it is because you have become the means of escape from myself; therefore you are very important to me and I must possess you, hold on to you. You become the conditioning factor, and escape is the conditioning. If we can be aware of our escapes, we can then perceive the factors, the influences that make for conditioning.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
"Am I escaping from myself through social work?"
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Are you attached to it, bound to it?  Would you feel lost, empty, bored, if you did not do social work?
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
"I am sure I would."
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Attachment to your work is your escape.  There are escapes at all the levels of our being.  You escape through work, another through drink, another through religious ceremonies, another through knowledge, another through God, and still another is addicted to amusement.  All escapes are the same, there is no superior or inferior escape.  God and drink are on the same level as long as they are escapes from what we are.  When we are aware of our escapes, only then can we know of our conditioning.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
"What shall I do if I cease to escape through social work?  Can I do anything without escaping?  Is not all my action a form of escape from what I am?"
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Is this question merely verbal, or does it reflect an actuality, a fact which you are experiencing?  If you did not escape, what would happen?  Have you ever tried it?
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
"What you are saying is so negative, if I may say so.  You don't offer any substitute for work."
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Is not all substitution another form of escape?  When one particular form of activity is not satisfactory or brings further conflict, we turn to another.  To replace one activity by another without understanding escape is rather futile, is it not?  It is these escapes and our attachment to them that make for conditioning. Conditioning brings problems, conflict.  It is conditioning that prevents our understanding of the challenge; being conditioned, our response must inevitably create conflict.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
"How can one be free from conditioning?"
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Only by understanding, being aware of our escapes.  Our attachment to a person, to work, to an ideology, is the conditioning factor; this is the thing we have to understand, and not seek a better or more intelligent escape.  All escapes are unintelligent, as they inevitably bring about conflict.  To cultivate detachment is another form of escape, of isolation; it is attachment to an abstraction, to an ideal called detachment.  The ideal is fictitious, ego-made, and becoming the ideal is an escape from what is.  There is the understanding of what is, an adequate action towards what is, only when the mind is no longer seeking any escape.  The very thinking about what is is an escape from what is.  Thinking about the problem is escape from the problem; for thinking is the problem, and the only problem.  The mind, unwilling to be what it is, fearful of what it is, seeks these various escapes; and the way of escape is thought.  As long as there is thinking, there must be escapes, attachments, which only strengthen conditioning.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Freedom from conditioning comes with the freedom from thinking. When the mind is utterly still, only then is there freedom for the real to be.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE></BODY></HTML>
